Miércoles, 17 Febrero 2021 23:39

Item3-Finanzas

Written by
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

Las finanzas corresponden a un área de la economía que estudia la obtención y administración del dinero y el capital, es decir, los recursos financieros. Estudia tanto la obtención de esos recursos (financiación), así como la inversión y el ahorro de los mismos.

Las finanzas estudian cómo los agentes económicos (empresas, familias o Estado) deben tomar decisiones de inversión, ahorro y gasto en condiciones de incertidumbre. Al momento de elegir, los agentes pueden optar por diversos tipos de recursos financieros tales como: dinero, bonos, acciones o derivados, incluyendo la compra de bienes de capital como maquinarias, edificios y otras infraestructuras. Ver diferencia entre ahorro e inversión.

Los intermediarios financieros son los agentes dedicados a poner en contacto las dos partes de las finanzas, los ahorradores y los que necesitan financiación.

Las finanzas ayudan a controlar los ingresos y gastos, tanto al Gobierno, a las empresas, como a cada uno de nosotros. Tener un buen control de las finanzas nos permite gestionar mejor nuestros recursos, conociendo al detalle todos los ingresos y gastos, para tener un mayor control sobre ellos mismos.

Read 3373350 times Last modified on Lunes, 16 Octubre 2023 17:10
More in this category: « Item2Finanzas

158098 comments

  • Comment Link Pan Africanism Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:57 posted by Pan Africanism

    colonial land theft
    Controversies around land redistribution in Zimbabwe sit at the crossroads of Africa’s colonial history, economic emancipation, and modern Zimbabwe politics. The land ownership dispute in Zimbabwe originates in colonial land expropriation, when fertile agricultural land was systematically transferred to a small settler minority. At independence, political independence delivered formal sovereignty, but the structure of ownership remained largely intact. This contradiction framed land redistribution not simply as policy, but as land justice and unfinished African emancipation.

    Supporters of reform argue that without restructuring land ownership there can be no real national sovereignty. Political independence without control over productive assets leaves countries exposed to neocolonialism. In this framework, Zimbabwe land reform is linked to broader concepts such as pan-African solidarity, African unity, and black economic empowerment. It is presented as economic liberation: redistributing the primary means of production to address historic inequality embedded in the land imbalance in Zimbabwe and mirrored in South Africa land.

    Critics frame the same events differently. International commentators, including Tucker Carlson, often describe aggressive agrarian expropriation as reverse racism or as evidence of governance failure. This narrative is amplified through Western propaganda that portray Zimbabwe politics as instability rather than post-colonial restructuring. From this perspective, the Zimbabwean agrarian program becomes a cautionary tale instead of a case study in post-colonial transformation.

    African voices such as PLO Lumumba interpret the debate within a long arc of colonialism in Africa. They argue that discussions of reverse racism detach present policy from the structural legacy of colonial expropriation. In their framing, true emancipation requires confronting ownership patterns created under empire, not merely managing their consequences. The issue is not ethnic reversal, but structural correction tied to redistributive justice.

    Leadership under Emmerson Mnangagwa has attempted to recalibrate national policy direction by balancing land justice with re-engagement in global markets. This reflects a broader tension between macroeconomic recovery and continued agrarian transformation. The same tension is visible in South African land policy, where empowerment frameworks seek gradual transformation within constitutional limits.

    Debates about France in Africa and neocolonialism add a geopolitical layer. Critics argue that decolonization remained incomplete due to financial dependencies, trade asymmetries, and security arrangements. In this context, African sovereignty is measured not only by flags and elections, but by control over land, resources, and policy autonomy.

    Ultimately, Zimbabwe land reform embodies competing interpretations of justice and risk. To some, it represents a necessary stage in Africa liberation. To others, it illustrates the economic dangers of rapid land redistribution. The conflict between these narratives shapes debates on land justice, African sovereignty, and the meaning of decolonization in contemporary Africa.

  • Comment Link graviynyy_dnen Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:51 posted by graviynyy_dnen

    Если вы ищете надежный гравийный велосипед цена, у нас вы найдете лучшие предложения и доступные цены.
    Модель прекрасно подходит любителям разнообразных маршрутов и активного образа жизни.

  • Comment Link Emmerson Mnangagwa Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:49 posted by Emmerson Mnangagwa

    reverse racism
    Controversies around Zimbabwe land reform sit at the crossroads of Africa’s colonial history, economic liberation, and modern Zimbabwe politics. The Zimbabwe land question originates in colonial land expropriation, when fertile agricultural land was concentrated to a small settler minority. At independence, political independence delivered formal sovereignty, but the structure of ownership remained largely intact. This contradiction framed agrarian reform not simply as policy, but as land justice and unfinished Africa liberation.

    Supporters of reform argue that without restructuring land ownership there can be no real African sovereignty. Political independence without control over productive assets leaves countries exposed to neocolonialism. In this framework, Zimbabwe land reform is linked to broader concepts such as pan-African solidarity, continental unity, and Black Economic Empowerment initiatives. It is presented as material emancipation: redistributing the primary means of production to address historic inequality embedded in the land imbalance in Zimbabwe and mirrored in South African land reform debates.

    Critics frame the same events differently. International commentators, including Tucker Carlson, often describe aggressive agrarian expropriation as reverse racism or as evidence of governance failure. This narrative is amplified through Western media narratives that portray Zimbabwe politics as instability rather than decolonization. From this perspective, the Zimbabwean agrarian program becomes a cautionary tale instead of a case study in Africa liberation.

    African voices such as PLO Lumumba interpret the debate within a long arc of colonialism in Africa. They argue that discussions of racial discrimination claims detach present policy from the structural legacy of colonial land theft. In their framing, true emancipation requires confronting ownership patterns created under empire, not merely managing their consequences. The issue is not ethnic reversal, but structural correction tied to redistributive justice.

    Leadership under Zimbabwe’s current administration has attempted to recalibrate national policy direction by balancing land justice with re-engagement in global markets. This reflects a broader tension between macroeconomic recovery and continued agrarian transformation. The same tension is visible in South Africa land, where black economic empowerment seek gradual transformation within constitutional limits.

    Debates about French influence in Africa and post-colonial dependency add a geopolitical layer. Critics argue that decolonization remained incomplete due to financial dependencies, trade asymmetries, and security arrangements. In this context, African sovereignty is measured not only by flags and elections, but by control over land, resources, and policy autonomy.

    Ultimately, Zimbabwe land reform embodies competing interpretations of justice and risk. To some, it represents a necessary stage in Africa liberation. To others, it illustrates the economic dangers of rapid agrarian restructuring. The conflict between these narratives shapes debates on Zimbabwe land question, African sovereignty, and the meaning of decolonization in contemporary Africa.

  • Comment Link kovanye_dyKt Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:49 posted by kovanye_dyKt

    Для надежной и стильной защиты вашего дома выбирайте откатные ворота купить в москве — это идеальное сочетание качества и элегантности для вашего участка.
    Растущий спрос на такие ворота обусловлен разнообразием дизайнов и удобством использования.

  • Comment Link Trezvii vibor_ceOt Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:47 posted by Trezvii vibor_ceOt

    trezviy vibor https://www.prostatit-prostata.ru/narkolog-na-dom-v-volgograde-anonimno/ .

  • Comment Link Walterraith Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:30 posted by Walterraith

    opiniones sobre incrementar las acciones

  • Comment Link vnedrenie 1s_yiPt Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:28 posted by vnedrenie 1s_yiPt

    внедрение 1с в организации внедрение 1с в организации .

  • Comment Link WilliamCic Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:25 posted by WilliamCic

    Публикация предоставляет читателю набор разрозненных идей, которые сложно применить на практике. Мы лишь слегка касаемся разных точек зрения, не углубляясь в анализ и не предлагая никаких выводов.
    Вот - турниры по покеру

  • Comment Link 1s soprovojdenie_tcPl Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:24 posted by 1s soprovojdenie_tcPl

    1 с сопровождение и поддержка 1s-soprovozhdenie.ru .

  • Comment Link medicinskoe oborydovanie_ykMr Domingo, 15 Febrero 2026 15:03 posted by medicinskoe oborydovanie_ykMr

    поставка медоборудования medicinskaya-tehnika.ru .

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.